BHSPI legal interpretation request on non compliant changes to MUTCD
Paul Pisano, Acting Director
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Transportation Operations (HOTO)
400 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20590
MUTCDofficialrequest@dot.com
RE:
Legal Interpretation, Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign
(R2-1) et al per 5 USC 706 the inclusions of
Statutory
and
Posted
Speed as
foundation for traffic control or police powers
authorities as promulgated in MUTCD, UVC or
referenced by Section 1A.11 et al,
Under the Color
of Federal Law, in each instance, absent fully
conforming factual foundations, are Unconstitutional,
Arbitrary and Capricious, Unsafe, Violates the Equal
Protection Clause, Substantive and Procedural Due
Process et al.
Amicus Curiae Attached – Hayduk v. South
Carolina, arguments/cites
We would like an interpretation regarding the current
use of Statutory, invented Posted Limits as the
foundation for traffic control and police powers
etc., Under the Color of Federal Law and other
related purported authorities or oversight standards
removal identified here, in context of this federally
regulated field. PDF version