BHSPI legal interpretation request on non compliant changes to MUTCD
Paul Pisano, Acting Director
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Transportation Operations (HOTO)
400 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20590
MUTCDofficialrequest@dot.com
RE:
Legal Interpretation, Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign
(R2-1) et al per 5 USC 706 the inclusions of
Statutory
and
Posted
Speed as
foundation for traffic control or police powers
authorities as promulgated in MUTCD, UVC or referenced
by Section 1A.11 et al, Under the Color of Federal
Law, in
each instance, absent fully conforming factual
foundations, are Unconstitutional, Arbitrary and
Capricious, Unsafe, Violates the Equal Protection
Clause, Substantive and Procedural Due Process et al.
Amicus Curiae Attached – Hayduk v. South
Carolina, arguments/cites
We would like an interpretation regarding the current
use of Statutory, invented Posted Limits as the
foundation for traffic control and police powers etc.,
Under the Color of Federal Law and other related
purported authorities or oversight standards removal
identified here, in context of this federally regulated
field. PDF version
